tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-678403253301408572.post6952189592937365713..comments2024-03-19T01:30:26.037-07:00Comments on Thank heaven for insurance companies: Can you tag your doctor a 'tool' online?Maura Larkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16800561169406889185noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-678403253301408572.post-67750773228934309492012-10-17T22:16:18.573-07:002012-10-17T22:16:18.573-07:00In David McKee MD vs Dennis Laurion, Minnesota Sup...In David McKee MD vs Dennis Laurion, Minnesota Supreme Court Case A11-1154, the plaintiff’s attorney told the Minnesota Supreme Court the correct way to critique a doctor at a rating site.<br /><br />Taken from comments to Minnesota Supreme Court:<br /><br />He may have been upset at how Dr. McKee treated his father. Apparently he was, and he’s entitled to say that. He can say that “I’m upset. Doctor McKee did not treat my father well. He was insensitive.” He can make statements like that: “He didn’t spend enough time in my opinion.” He can make factual (sic) statements, he can make them on the Internet, he can make them in letters, he can write a letter to the editor, he can stand in front of St. Luke’s Hospital with a placard saying those things if they are opinions . . .<br /><br />Case Summary:<br />http://www.mncourts.gov/Documents/0/Public/Calendars/September_2012_Summary.htm<br /><br />Video link:<br />http://www.tpt.org/courts/MNJudicialBranchvideo_NEW.php?number=A111154# <br />Court Watchhttp://defamationlaw.net/mckee-v-laurion-the-defamation-saga-continues/noreply@blogger.com