Showing posts with label colonoscopy anesthesia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colonoscopy anesthesia. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Deep sedation for colonoscopy might not be safe
Consumer Reports
Nov. 19, 2014

Getting knocked out during a colonoscopy might seem like a good idea. After all, being awake as your doctor uses a long, flexible tube to get an inside view of your lower intestines doesn't sound very appealing. To avoid that problem, many doctors now routinely use the drug propofol (Diprivan) during colonoscopy to cause deep sedation in their patients.
But beware: That drug, which was reportedly given to Joan Rivers  soon before she died, might not be the healthiest choice and could put you at risk for some serious complications.
Don’t get the wrong idea: Colonoscopies are usually safe (about 3 out of every 1,000 people suffer a serious complication). And the procedure is proved to prevent colon cancer deaths. So if you’re ages 50 to 75, you should be screened (see our guide, "The Cancer Tests You Really Need," to find out how often you should be screened). 
But deep sedation isn't necessary. Colonoscopy can be done using conscious sedation or even none at all. “You should always try to aim for the lightest level of sedation that you need,” says Consumer Reports' medical adviser, Orly Avitzur, M.D. “The trend toward deep sedation is worrisome because it increases risk.”
For example, propofol increases your risk of aspiration pneumonia (caused by inhaling particles such as vomit, mucus, or saliva) by almost 50 percent, according to a study by Gregory Cooper, M.D., in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. And it can cause a host of other side effects, including confusion, seizures, irregular heart beats, and potentially deadly allergic reactions.  
“For the general population there’s not a lot of good data saying patients have a better outcome with propofol when there’s not a medical indication,” says Cooper, a professor of medicine at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. “It’s overkill.”
Instead, Cooper says he uses the narcotics fentanyl (Duragesic and others) or meperidine (Demerol) combined with midazolam (Versed) to induce light sedation during colonoscopies.  
And propofol is expensive. Colonoscopies using anesthesia cost about 20 percent more than those done without, according to Cooper. And a 2013 research letter in JAMA Internal Medicine titled, "Propofol for screening colonoscopy: Are we paying too much?" said that the use of propofol typically added $600 to $2,000 to the price tag.
Screening colonoscopies are covered by insurance plans, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, although you might have to pay for part of the anesthesiologist’s fees, bowel prep kit, pathology costs, and a facility fee. But even so, “Somebody’s got to pay for it, whether it’s the insurance company or the patients,” Cooper says, adding that the current system provides a financial motivation for using more anesthesia.
But the rising tide of propofol use could be about to ebb. Beginning Jan. 1, 2015, Medicare is changing how it pays anesthesia professionals for colonoscopy care. Gastroenterologists will be paid a set amount that will cover the anesthesia cost, even if an anesthesiologist, for example, administers it. Doctors will then have to decide whether to recommend expensive anesthesia, which could include hiring a nurse anesthetist or anesthesiologist and pay them out of the same pot, or choose a less pricey option. “There may be a financial disincentive for Medicare doctors to recommend deep sedation,” Avitzur says.
We’ll have to wait to find out if commercial insurers follow Medicare’s lead. If they do, says Cooper, “There will be less cost to the health care system since there won’t be another bill from the anesthesiologist.”
Until then, if you’re gearing up to have a colonoscopy, make sure you discuss your anesthesia options with your doctor before the procedure.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Unconscious patient's cell phone captures doctors mocking him during colonoscopy

See all posts on colonoscopies.

Unconscious patient's cell phone captures doctors mocking him during colonoscopy.
Sarah Fruchtnicht
Opposingviews.com
22 Apr 2014

A Virginia man is suing after his cell phone captured audio of doctors allegedly mocking him while he was under anesthesia for a colonoscopy.

The plaintiff, D.B., says doctors joked about firing a gun up his rectum and accused him of having STDs during his medical procedure.

"On April 18, 2013, during a colonoscopy, plaintiff was verbally brutalized and defamed by the very doctors to whom he entrusted his life while under anesthesia," the complaint says.

D.B. sued Safe Sedation LLC and Safe Sedation Management in Fairfax County Court for defamation, infliction of emotional distress and illegally disclosing his health records.

The patient said he left his phone on and recorded everything on accident. When he later drove home with his wife, they discovered the recording.

The doctors, Tiffany Ingham and Soloman Shah, are not named as defendants but are accused of mocking D.B. as soon as the anesthetic knocked him out.

"Tiffany Ingham, M.D. started to mock, and then continued to mock, the amount of medicine required to anesthetize plaintiffs," the complaint states. "Referring to plaintiff, Soloman Shah, M.D. commented that a teaching physician known to both him and Tiffany Ingham, M.D. 'would eat him for lunch.'

"Tiffany Ingham, M.D. agreed that plaintiff would be 'eaten alive' and also jokingly discussed a hypothetical of firing a gun up a rectum," it says.

"And really, after five minutes of talking to you in pre-op I wanted to punch you in the face and man you up a little bit," Ingham allegedly said to the patient while he was under.

Doctors allegedly discussed D.B.'s prescription medication and an irritation he had on his penis. v "A medical assistant at GMA touched plaintiff's penis during the colonoscopy," the complaint states. "Although plaintiff's penis is not involved in a colonoscopy, the medical assistant noted there was not 'much of a penile rash.' Tiffany Ingham, M.D. responded, 'No, you'll accidentally rub up against it. Some syphilis on your arm or something.' Solomon Shah, M.D. responded, 'That would be bad. That would be real bad.'"

"Tiffany Ingham, M.D. then stated to all present in the operating suite that, 'It's probably tuberculosis in the penis, so you'll be all right.'"

The lawsuit notes that the plaintiff has neither disease.

In a final remark on tape, Ingham allegedly said she would make a note in D.B.'s file that he had hemorrhoids even though he didn't.

He's seeking $1 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages. COMMENTS

No need to anesthetize everyone
By: Publicgood

I did just fine during my colonoscopy with no anesthesia at all. I think doctors who anesthetize all patients are doing it for the same reason that they refuse to allow patients to have a DVD of the procedure: they don't want to listen to patient's questions either during the procedure or later on.

Colonoscopy souvenir DVDs
By: Publicgood

I am shocked that doctors across the US have stopped providing DVDs of colonoscopies in response to medical records requests. It's okay that they don't automatically give souvenir DVDs, but it's not okay to violate the law regarding patient's rights to access to their medical records. Doctors even claim that it's a cost-cutting measure; this is obviously false since digital memory is getting cheaper by the month and has always been cheaper and more compact than the VHS tapes on which colonoscopies used to be saved.